.

Virginia GOP Convention Over Primary: Good Move?

The Virginia Republican Party will nominate its candidates during a convention this week, and some experts have weighed in on the system.

 

When Virginia’s Republican Party made a last-minute decision to nominate candidates for the 2013 election in a convention instead of a primary, as originally planned, it prompted Lt. Gov. Bill Bolling to withdraw his name from the race for governor.

The move made the especially conservative Ken Cuccinelli, Virginia’s current attorney general, the GOP’s de facto nominee for governor. He's expected to be officially nominated during the Virginia Republican Convention this week on May 17 and 18 in Richmond. (See our guide to the convention right here.)

See Also: Poll: Does the Virginia GOP Convention Represent True Democracy?

Bolling said he dropped out of the race because he didn’t agree with the convention system, arguing that it made the nomination exlusionary.

“Conventions are by their very nature exclusive, and at a time when we need to be projecting a positive image and reaching out to involve more Virginians in the Republican Party, I am unwilling to be part of a process that could seriously damage our image and appeal,” he said in his statement at the time.

But the switch to a convention also severely hurt his chances at winning the nomination.

“[Bolling’s] prospects declined greatly when the Republicans made the decision to go to the convention for the primary,” said Stephen Farnsworth, a professor of political science at the University of Mary Washington.

A Republican Convention nomination system would heavily favor the more conservative candidate, Farnsworth told Patch.

“The convention process is tailor-made for giving you the most extreme nominee,” he said. “General elections are won and lost in the ideological center, but the nomination campaigns usually favor more extreme candidates.”

And that was part of the problem Bolling was addressing when he dropped out, said Mark Rozell, a public policy professor at George Mason University.

“Conventions are notorious at times for picking candidates who do not do well in general elections,” Rozell said. "You want to give a candidate the opportunity to reach out to a broader spectrum of voters, and that’s what a primary forces the candidate to do. It teaches a candidate to hone a message for a broader audience … and not just appeal to partisan activists.”

Cuccinelli and Bolling, along with Gov. Bob McDonnell, were nominated at a convention in 2009. The party’s State Central Committee then voted to change back to a primary for 2013.

But a series of new members elected to the committee changed all that. The committee voted again in June 2012 to hold a convention instead.

“A Republican primary would involve the most conservative 5 percent of the electorate, basically,” Farnsworth said. “A convention would be the most conservative fraction of that five percent.”

Cuccinelli’s camp has maintained that he would have sought the nomination for governor in whatever process was selected, but he has been a supporter of conventions in the past.

“We’ve been anticipating running in a primary, but we’d obviously rather use the two to three million dollars we’d save in a convention to use against Democrats in a general election,” Noah Wall, Cuccinelli’s political dirtector, told the Washington Post last year.

Jay McConville, chairman of Fairfax County's Republican Committee, said he didn't have opinion on a convention as opposed to a primary.

"We know that either convention or primary are valid methods of doing it and we leave it to the process to pick that method," McConville said. "There are people in the committee who believe that it should be convention all the time and there’s others who believe in primaries, so we allow the process to work it through election by election."

Virginia's GOP will have to wait and see what the system means for its gubernatorial candidate.

“Ken Cuccinelli has really created a profile for himself politically that is very conservative, which is great for winning nominations,” Farnsworth said. “How it’ll work in a general election, we’ll see in November.”

Which do you think is better - convention, or primary? Why? Tell us in the comments below.

 

Never miss out on any Fairfax news - follow us!

Sign up for Fairfax City Patch’s daily newsletter
"Like" us on Facebook
"Follow" us on Twitter

Kim McCoy May 13, 2013 at 08:18 PM
I don't care which is utilized as long as Ken Cuccinelli becomes Virginia's next Governor.....He is a man of outstanding legal knowledge, America values, and led the Virginia charge against the disaster that is Obamacare. I can't think of a better man of character to represent Virginia as governor....GOOD LUCK MR. CUCCINELLI!!!!!!
Blac Jack June 11, 2013 at 02:31 AM
The convention is the preferable method to nomimate candidates of political parites. The parties are private organizations and should pay for their own nomination process. They do this when they use a convention to nominate a candidate. If the party uses the public election system of officials and polling places, then the parties should reimburse the taxpayer for the cost of using the process. Aside from any analysis of which nominating process is smarter in nominating candidates, the GOP, in this instance and for whatever reason, proved that it truly believes in fiscal responsibility by not sticking the taxpayer with the cost of their private nominating process. Private political parties that are allowed to stick the taxpayer for the cost of their nominating process only grow arrogant inabusing taxpayer funds for other uses.

Boards

More »
Got a question? Something on your mind? Talk to your community, directly.
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors.What's on your mind?What's on your mind?Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell somethingPost something