Hispanics, African Americans and Asians make up about 30 percent of 's student body, but, a few years from now, that percentage could drop if the Supreme Court reverses its position on affirmative action.
Last week, the court announced it will hear arguments this fall for a Texas case in which the plaintiff claims she was discriminated against attending the University of Texas because she is white.
The use of affirmative action in college admissions was last upheld in 2003, but the makeup of the Supreme Court has since changed significantly. In The Huffington Post, law professor Ediberto Roman said he believes the conservative bloc of justices will likely eradicate the practice "once and for all."
The court's ultimate decision could have major implications. A reversal of the current opinion would change the way hundreds of college admissions departments around the country use affirmative action policies to sift through millions of applications each year. According to data compiled by U.S. News & World Report, it could affect thousands of students applying to George Mason University alone.
University of Virginia Law Professor Tomiko Brown-Nagin says historical data suggests the elimination of affirmative action would likely result in whiter college campuses.
"After the passage of one of the propositions in California that banned the use of race in admissions, the number of blacks and Hispanics admitted to the flagship schools did decrease significantly," Brown-Nagin said.
But, she explained, the use of affirmative action has been more nuanced since the court's 2003 decision. "Many institutions have already cut back on their use of affirmative action policies ... (they) consider it among several other factors. It has to be non-determinative."
For some schools, the Supreme Court ruling will have no bearing on admissions. Smaller campuses like in Arlington and community schools like don't use affirmative action at all. Open admissions allow students who qualify based on test scores and grades to automatically enroll.
The policy is really only used by the most competitive schools in the country, Brown-Nagin said. "Those are the ones that really have their choice of applicants and all of the applicants are quite competitive," she said.
A spokesman for George Mason University emphasized that the school has no specific diversity quotas. , another competitive school that uses affirmative action, released a statement to Patch explaining its admissions department takes a "holistic approach to the undergraduate admissions process" and that "We are watching with interest the developments from the Supreme Court."
Qian Tsai, the director of the demographics and workforce group at the University of Virginia's Weldon Cooper Center for Public Service, said regardless of the affirmative action ruling, college campuses will become more diverse in the long run.
"In the next 10 to 15 years, white will be the minority," Tsai said. "We’re already seeing that now in the under 18 population, Hispanics and Asians are growing rapidly. That has to do with the birth rate."
Tsai said it's hard to predict how college demographics will change if the court reverses the policy.
"It's possible that we would see an increase in the white population in the college campus" in the short-term, she said.
But Brown-Nagin isn't convinced that affirmative action is all-but dead. She thinks Justice Anthony Kennedy, who many believe will vote with the traditionally conservative justices, could swing his vote in favor of the policy.
"He always has an interesting take on the use of race by educational institutions," she said. "He could be skeptical, but he could have a different view. That could mean the outcome is not so certain as some people seem to think it is."
There is not a single fact in your article that supports your headline, "With reversal on affirmative action, enrollments could become less diverse." Nothing that supports your opening sentence either. Maybe you could find a college somewhere in the United States that would be affected, and put this article in their Patch. But Fairfax City? No way. Comment?
The challenge of course is in making college available and affordable for those who want to go to college... its not right for everyone... Is there is any "preference" that should be emphasized for Virginia's colleges, it probably should be a "preference" for Virginia residents. Now, that is a stat that has been changing (by observation) over the years...most likely because out of state students pay more...
To underscore your point, I have a demographer quoted in the article who says college campuses will become more diverse with or without affirmative action in the long-run, but the short-term effects (if the court reverses its position) are less clear. I certainly didn't insert any of my personal opinion in the article, but, again, I appreciate the feedback. Thanks for reading. Lauren
Fortunately, private schools are mostly free to take the best, regardless of their party affiliation, race, ethnicity, or gender.
When you subsidize something you get more of it, therefore a demand higher than market price. The subsidies keep the cost of education very high.
You are injecting your political opinions into this piece. And as supported by your history of posting on HuffPo and for MTV, it's obvious which side you're on. First, the one legal expert you consult is a well-known liberal defender of affirmative action. Is there any question she's going to defend the practice and exaggerate the harms? Did you even try to get an opinion on the other side of the debate? Surely between the more libertarian/conservative professors at GMU law or a DC think tank, you could have found someone who might disagree with your preconceived conclusions. Second, your statement that colleges "could" become less diverse can only be correct if you focus solely on race, and even then only if you don't count Asian-Americans. If you'd actually look at the numbers in California, while Hispanic and black admission percentages have decreased at the elite public universities, the percentage of Asian-Americans have increased. Overall minority percentages did not drastically changed. Moreover, according to public opinion polls, most Americans recognize that diversity is not defined solely by race (unlike your UVA professor and HuffPo writers). The real issue for people like Tomiko who favor institutionalized racism is that she feels her favored group might be harmed. Indeed, implicit in her answers is her belief that having more white people at college is wrong. Is there any evidence she shares MLK’s dream of a colorblind society?
Mike, I see that you're a little angry. Dr. Paul isn't going to win on promoting Armageddon or with anger/fear. College today teaches someone how to learn on their own. It teaches critical thinking skills which is way more important that specific skills. With critical thinking skills someone can more easily learn any job. Everyone in this country owes a great deal of thanks for subsidized education, there are benefits that are incalculable. What a horrible nation this would be if we did everything based on cost analysis. By trying to take away the rights of others to a higher education only dumbs down the populace and has no place in a forward looking, compassionate and reality based society.
By the way, you have a truly amazing and outstanding family. I love reading about them in your mailings, though I hope never to need to be a client :).
http://nbc12.wordpress.com/2012/02/13/connolly-launches-truth-squad-defends-obama-budget/
I can't tell you how much I enjoyed reading your comment, not because it was somewhat aligned with my view of AA, but because it really goes directly to the issue of what it takes to achieve your dreams in our wonderful country, what ever those dreams are. I support Affirmative Action (AA), when it means that I, as an individual and as a business man, should make an effort to hire a "qualified" minority when I look around my business and see mostly white faces. AA means to me that I have an obligation to hire a minority when that person has the "minimum" skills necessary to do the job I need done. It also means that I should also train, guide, and coach that minority to be more than minimally qualified to help that person be "highly qualified and competitive". It's called "mentoring". My 40 years of experience with this AA approach has been hugely successful for me and for my employees when I was dealing with a minority person that demonstrated the kinds of values that you describe in your comment. When I hired a minority person who was energetic, self-motivating, always seeking more knowledge and skills, I found that I was more than willing to do what it takes to help them improve. This was also true of white employees. My gripe is that the laws that created Affirmative Action have been highjacked and twisted to mandate QUOTAS, which are specifically against the laws that created AA.