Abortion Legislation Sparks Debate on Right and Wrong

Legislation calls for sonograms for pregnant women seeking abortions.

Four bills before the 2012 Virginia General Assembly regarding sonograms and abortions have forced people to choose sides.

According to the Capital News Service, two Republican backed bills were introduced in the House of Delegates that would mandate ultrasound testing before an abortion. House Bill 261, filed by Del. Mark Cole from Fredericksburg, would require ultrasound testing at least 48 hours before the abortion is performed. HB 462, filed by Del. Kathy Byron from Lynchburg proposes that fetal ultrasound imaging be done at least two hours before an abortion. In addition, the sound of the fetus’s heart would be examined in another effort to determine the gestational age of the fetus, according to CNS.

Olivia Gans, president of the Virginia Society of Human Life, told Patch the organization supports the ultrasound bill.

"We see this as a sensible extension of the 'Women's Right to Know' Informed Consent law in Virginia. Doctors should give women a chance to see the image of their own child in the womb before she makes this permanent life and death decision for that baby," she said.

In the past, many bills restricting abortion rights have been killed in the Democratic-controlled Senate, according to CNS, but recent Republican gains in the upper chamber increase the odds that such legislation will pass this session.

Republicans in the Senate also introduced bills pushing for ultrasounds for women seeking abortions. Sen. Ralph Smith of Roanoke sponsored Senate Bill 279 and Sen. Jill Vogel of Winchester proposed SB 484. Gans said it's possible the two House bills will combine, as will the two Senate bills in order to go forward.

Rose Codding, director of patient services at the Falls Church Healthcare Center, said the sonogram legislation being considered in Virginia is insulting to women. In an open letter written to Virginia legislators, Codding said the bills are not related to medical necessity and they disregard women's feelings and wishes. She said they are not related to good healthcare and disregards physician’s expertise and specialized training.

"If ACOG (American Congress of Obstetricians and Gynecologists) or our NAF (National Abortion Federation) made that a standard based on appropriate medical evidence that would be one thing," Codding said in a statement to Patch. "But laws that mandate specifics on medical treatment bypassing the medical experts is wrong and an intrusion on the doctors practice and the patient's rights."

For more than a decade, FCHC has provided reproductive health care in Virginia. Codding said the center's staff understands that facing an unplanned pregnancy is about much more than a medical experience for women. What legislators are doing in Virginia is cruel and unjust to women and it is embarrassing in light of what America is supposed to stand for to the rest of the world, she said. Women will do whatever it takes to get an abortion when they want or need one, she said.

At FCHC, Codding said they routinely provide ultrasounds for gynecological care as needed and for all pregnancy related services including miscarriage management, gestational age determination and abortion care to get a supported clinical understanding of the reproductive systems of the patient and to help develop appropriate care plans. All medically provided testing and screenings are always kept as part of a patient’s medical record, she said.

Gans said doctors should give women a chance to see the image of their own child in the womb before she makes a permanent life and death decision for that baby.

"Ultrasound technology is routinely used by abortionists to identify where the unborn baby is and the size and age of that baby," Gans said. "It will not be a burden on doctors to allow women to look at that image too."

Mike Ritter January 21, 2012 at 12:32 PM
The hypocrite repub's claim they want to take govt out of healthcare, yet this is exactly the opposite what they claim. The ultrasound serves no medical value other than to feed their hypocritical values upon people. Many of these so called "family values" are same ones supporting the serial adulterer Newt Gingrich (and he has the gaule to preach "family values). Nothing but hypocrites. Let us not forget the Terry Schiivo case! Same thing. Repubs didn't get their way in any court, so they tried to bring in fed's. Just about as 2 faced as you can get, no matter how they try to spin it or justify it. Keep ALL govt out of Dr - patient relationship.
Richard Plocica January 21, 2012 at 04:32 PM
Yes the party of liars, thieves and hypocrites - is trying to impose their religious bigotry on others. Under their logic we also should not treat people for cancer even if curable it is "God's will" -- no medicine or personal consideration for costs or suffering. How did we invent the light bulb with that thinking?


More »
Got a question? Something on your mind? Talk to your community, directly.
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors.What's on your mind?What's on your mind?Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell somethingPost something